![]() |
![]() |
|
|
We have something of a conundrum that we have been struggling with. We have two machines that are attached to projectors so that we can project network status information up |
![]() |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
We have something of a conundrum that we have been struggling with. We have
two machines that are attached to projectors so that we can project network status information up on our wall. These machines run 24/7 and are configured so that there is no screen saver and the monitor never powers down (so the critical network data is ALWAYS displayed). For these two machines we have two login choices: 1) Login using our individual accounts. 2) Login using a shared account. It seems to me that both are somewhat problematic. If we login using our individual accounts then there is the possibility that people could do harmful things under the logged in user account, which could potentially get the owner of that account into hot water unfairly. Other employees could also gain access to shared network resources that are mapped for the logged on user account, which in many cases will be resources that not everyone is authorized to access. With bathroom breaks, lunch, and meetings it is impossible for the account owner to be in the room at all times to make sure such things do not happen, so we are stuck with this situation. If we use a shared login account then it becomes more difficult--and maybe impossible in some cases--to determine who did what on the network. So this morning I did some brainstorming on how we might have the best of both worlds, and I wanted to run the idea by the people who frequent this newsgroup. I thought that we could start with a shared account and configure the auto login option. Once the desktop comes up a special program would kick in and display a custom login dialog. The program would disable the CTRL+ALT+DEL key combination, the mouse, and the Start menu (so the user could not get around the process by going to the Task Manager and ending the task), and it would also prevent the user from changing the active window. There might need to be some other things locked down as well, like the Run box, but basically the user would be forced to enter a valid AD account and password. Once the requested information has been supplied the program would log it to a file along with the date and time, and the log file itself would be encrypted and inaccessible to users. Everything that was locked down (CTRL+ALT+DEL, mouse, etc.) would then be unlocked and the user would be free to work on the machine as necessary. That would allow us to reap the benefits of having a common login on those machines, while still having an electronic record of who actually logged in. Is this idea something that could be done as I'm conceptualizing? Is there an easier way to achieve our goal of recording who logs in without having to use individual accounts? Thanks for any insight that you may be able to offer. --Tom |
||
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Log Client Logins | Tom | Windows 2003 Server | 2 | 07-24-2008 03:24 PM |
| IE tabs and logins | NewsBot | Microsoft News | 0 | 05-05-2008 12:33 AM |
| simultaneous logins | Computerguy | Windows 2003 Server | 2 | 04-21-2008 06:59 AM |
| How to Log logins | Jason M | Windows XP | 2 | 08-22-2007 11:02 AM |
| Server Logins | pf | Windows 2003 Server | 1 | 08-08-2007 09:34 PM |