![]() |
![]() |
|
|
I've been told during Windows 98 days that it's good to run Scandisk and Defragmentation regularly to keep the computer spick and span. Does it still apply to these days |
![]() |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I've been told during Windows 98 days that it's good to run Scandisk and
Defragmentation regularly to keep the computer spick and span. Does it still apply to these days of Windows XP and Vista? As a matter of fact I carry out these maintenance measures every week, but would like to know their relevance in the present day software environment. Thanks. |
||
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
IMHO, no.
-- ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear) MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002 AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net DTS-L http://dts-l.net/ Penorama wrote: > I've been told during Windows 98 days that it's good to run Scandisk and > Defragmentation regularly to keep the computer spick and span. Does it > still > apply to these days of Windows XP and Vista? > > As a matter of fact I carry out these maintenance measures every week, but > would like to know their relevance in the present day software > environment. > > Thanks. |
||
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#3 | ||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Penorama <Penorama@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>I've been told during Windows 98 days that it's good to run Scandisk and >Defragmentation regularly to keep the computer spick and span. Does it still >apply to these days of Windows XP and Vista? Not as much. Fragmentation is not nearly as big a deal in NTFS as in FAT file systems. -- Tim Slattery MS MVP(Shell/User) Slattery_T@bls.gov http://members.cox.net/slatteryt |
||
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You are over doing it.
Defragmentation in XP is not nearly as critical to performance as is was in Win98. Once a month should be just fine, in fact I took a look just now at the last time I defragmented my C: drive and it was more than four months ago and I haven't noticed any significant drop in performance. JS "Penorama" <Penorama@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:A337E676-9FE7-484C-9E62-F675F87F581F@microsoft.com... > I've been told during Windows 98 days that it's good to run Scandisk and > Defragmentation regularly to keep the computer spick and span. Does it > still > apply to these days of Windows XP and Vista? > > As a matter of fact I carry out these maintenance measures every week, but > would like to know their relevance in the present day software > environment. > > Thanks. |
||
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Oh every 6 months or so, give or take 2 or 3.
Penorama wrote: > I've been told during Windows 98 days that it's good to run Scandisk and > Defragmentation regularly to keep the computer spick and span. Does it still > apply to these days of Windows XP and Vista? > > As a matter of fact I carry out these maintenance measures every week, but > would like to know their relevance in the present day software environment. > > Thanks. |
||
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Penorama wrote:
> I've been told during Windows 98 days that it's good to run Scandisk > and Defragmentation regularly to keep the computer spick and span. > Does it still apply to these days of Windows XP and Vista? > > As a matter of fact I carry out these maintenance measures every > week, but would like to know their relevance in the present day > software environment. > [Joke shortened] Doctor is leaning over a fallen actor on the stage of a Yiddish theater around the turn of the last century. From the back of the balcony, a Yiddisha-mama voice cries out: "Give him an enema!" The doctor stands and shouts back: "Madam, the actor is dead!" Same voice from the balcony, a bit more sheepishly: "So, it can't hurt." |
||
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The joke doesn't apply. Unnecessary defragging will simply wear the disk out
faster for no good reason. -- Gary S. Terhune MS-MVP Shell/User http://grystmill.com "HeyBub" <heybub@gmail.com> wrote in message news:OcpUStJCJHA.2476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > Penorama wrote: >> I've been told during Windows 98 days that it's good to run Scandisk >> and Defragmentation regularly to keep the computer spick and span. >> Does it still apply to these days of Windows XP and Vista? >> >> As a matter of fact I carry out these maintenance measures every >> week, but would like to know their relevance in the present day >> software environment. >> > > [Joke shortened] > > Doctor is leaning over a fallen actor on the stage of a Yiddish theater > around the turn of the last century. > > From the back of the balcony, a Yiddisha-mama voice cries out: "Give him > an enema!" > > The doctor stands and shouts back: "Madam, the actor is dead!" > > Same voice from the balcony, a bit more sheepishly: "So, it can't hurt." > |
||
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
HeyBub wrote:
> Penorama wrote: >> I've been told during Windows 98 days that it's good to run Scandisk >> and Defragmentation regularly to keep the computer spick and span. >> Does it still apply to these days of Windows XP and Vista? >> >> As a matter of fact I carry out these maintenance measures every >> week, but would like to know their relevance in the present day >> software environment. >> > > [Joke shortened] > > Doctor is leaning over a fallen actor on the stage of a Yiddish theater > around the turn of the last century. > > From the back of the balcony, a Yiddisha-mama voice cries out: "Give him > an > enema!" > > The doctor stands and shouts back: "Madam, the actor is dead!" > > Same voice from the balcony, a bit more sheepishly: "So, it can't hurt." <rimshot> |
||
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
That is an absolutely ridiculous statement. Granted, disks wear out.
However, as a product, they have a life expectancy. If a disk fails chances are it won't be because of defragging. Did it ever occur to you that there could be MORE wear if it is NOT defragged? "Gary S. Terhune" <none> wrote in message news:uTcPTxJCJHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > The joke doesn't apply. Unnecessary defragging will simply wear the disk > out faster for no good reason. > > -- > Gary S. Terhune > MS-MVP Shell/User > http://grystmill.com > > "HeyBub" <heybub@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:OcpUStJCJHA.2476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> Penorama wrote: >>> I've been told during Windows 98 days that it's good to run Scandisk >>> and Defragmentation regularly to keep the computer spick and span. >>> Does it still apply to these days of Windows XP and Vista? >>> >>> As a matter of fact I carry out these maintenance measures every >>> week, but would like to know their relevance in the present day >>> software environment. >>> >> >> [Joke shortened] >> >> Doctor is leaning over a fallen actor on the stage of a Yiddish theater >> around the turn of the last century. >> >> From the back of the balcony, a Yiddisha-mama voice cries out: "Give him >> an enema!" >> >> The doctor stands and shouts back: "Madam, the actor is dead!" >> >> Same voice from the balcony, a bit more sheepishly: "So, it can't hurt." >> > > |
||
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
There's a balance to be struck. Of course a heavily fragmented disk will
endure more wear, but overuse of defrag will do the same. And of course fewer disks wear out due to excessive defragging. It's more the opposite. The vast majority of them are of the first type -- not enough defragging, rather than too much. But that doesn't make my statement ridiculous. It's a true statement. -- Gary S. Terhune MS-MVP Shell/User http://grystmill.com "Unknown" <unknown@unknown.kom> wrote in message news:EqBtk.19431$jI5.568@flpi148.ffdc.sbc.com... > That is an absolutely ridiculous statement. Granted, disks wear out. > However, as a product, they have a life expectancy. > If a disk fails chances are it won't be because of defragging. Did it ever > occur to you that there could be MORE wear if it is NOT defragged? > "Gary S. Terhune" <none> wrote in message > news:uTcPTxJCJHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> The joke doesn't apply. Unnecessary defragging will simply wear the disk >> out faster for no good reason. >> >> -- >> Gary S. Terhune >> MS-MVP Shell/User >> http://grystmill.com >> >> "HeyBub" <heybub@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:OcpUStJCJHA.2476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>> Penorama wrote: >>>> I've been told during Windows 98 days that it's good to run Scandisk >>>> and Defragmentation regularly to keep the computer spick and span. >>>> Does it still apply to these days of Windows XP and Vista? >>>> >>>> As a matter of fact I carry out these maintenance measures every >>>> week, but would like to know their relevance in the present day >>>> software environment. >>>> >>> >>> [Joke shortened] >>> >>> Doctor is leaning over a fallen actor on the stage of a Yiddish theater >>> around the turn of the last century. >>> >>> From the back of the balcony, a Yiddisha-mama voice cries out: "Give him >>> an enema!" >>> >>> The doctor stands and shouts back: "Madam, the actor is dead!" >>> >>> Same voice from the balcony, a bit more sheepishly: "So, it can't hurt." >>> >> >> > > |
||
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Defragmentation | Jeff | Windows Update | 0 | 05-24-2008 04:55 PM |
| Defragmentation | Reg Garbett | Windows XP | 18 | 02-28-2008 09:19 PM |
| Disk Defragmentation with power lost | Disk Defrag after lost power | Windows Vista | 6 | 02-09-2008 10:17 PM |
| Defragmentation. | Rod | Windows 98 | 18 | 11-11-2007 07:50 PM |
| Problem with the Defragmentation | david | Windows XP | 3 | 08-04-2007 06:41 PM |